I really like the questions you pose that open doors to rooms that I like to contemplate in . The artist Vermeer , had apparently used a lens mirror system to get the hyperrealism that he painted . The precursor to the camera . Yet , does that eliminate his validity ? Then you have the photographer Ansel Adams , who had a female assistant who was not his wife , who encouraged him to push his images into severe contrasts of black and white , thus creating the look that his work encompassed , magical desert worlds . So in the one case , it was some additional technology , in the other case , another set of eyes and heart . The validity of the NFT art world , which is always using technology , even if it is a painted by hand and pigment image , it is imaged in pixels on a computer screen and signed by a non reproducable code . Eventually , the whole story gets to be more of the story , than the image seen . The essence of the science that you are developing - seemingly alone , I am sure on the backs of a few others , is in the story of your focus and the consequences . Just like Vangogh's art - the swirling skies and color contrasts , actually described math that was previously un interpreted , all art is truth seen by the artist , and contained in a stilled dimension , a mini museum - be it a canvas , a theoretical paper , or a dance move , until the moment when it can be discerned by a viewer , or by the collective consciousness . Practicing art is not about owning , rather it is about crystallizing truths so that they can be disseminated and at the same time remain complete . The beauty of a song or an image , is that it is at the same time held still , and at the same time radiated outwards . I believe that the AI description of your work that you put up in the beginning of this article is merely the trumpet announcing the masters work . AI is here to SERVE us , not to be served by us . We should never feel competitive with it . Keep doing your work - you are looking at something that is very important - Biological System Triggering and Harnessing .
For a while , when photography first came out , it was art / not art / then the artists pushed it into art again . The fact that it requires a camera which is a machine , makes it a good medium to analyze this question with , as many people will say " what camera , what lens " and the photographer is like " My mind , my eye " - Ultimately , the speed required to respond to action light and energy requires the speed of heart consciousness , the mind cannot cause a trigger reaction in the moment . - I had an experience once when I captured a moment where a polo pony was running , four legs off the ground , the mallet at that moment swung down , and the weight of the horses body mid air and the swing of the mallet actually split the ball in half . And , it was captured by my finger . So ... it is in the story . Now , on the music field , the computer can sort of fabricate songs , song ish sounding noises , but there is no name , no story , no heart . So I do believe it gets down to heart .
I was on a Zoom chat yesterday where this program was demonstrated. My assessment is that by very quickly scouring the entire Internet for relevant information it mimics left brain precision analysis and creation. I see how it will be used to replace humans in jobs that require regimentation. In many respects it represents the median point in human capacity. Which is efficient and perfect for industrial applications. In our conversation, the question was asked, ‘What is a human?’and my response was “A human is a being who is responsible and accountable.” Can AI be considered a morally responsible being? Can it distinguish between right and wrong, not in the abstract, but it’s own awareness of what means to be a morally responsible industrial application? Your point about creating high hanging fruit is the right question and, as discussed in our group, begs the question about how education in the future must change to meet this reality.
Great point. Clean AI leaves opportunity for dirty humans.
I really like the questions you pose that open doors to rooms that I like to contemplate in . The artist Vermeer , had apparently used a lens mirror system to get the hyperrealism that he painted . The precursor to the camera . Yet , does that eliminate his validity ? Then you have the photographer Ansel Adams , who had a female assistant who was not his wife , who encouraged him to push his images into severe contrasts of black and white , thus creating the look that his work encompassed , magical desert worlds . So in the one case , it was some additional technology , in the other case , another set of eyes and heart . The validity of the NFT art world , which is always using technology , even if it is a painted by hand and pigment image , it is imaged in pixels on a computer screen and signed by a non reproducable code . Eventually , the whole story gets to be more of the story , than the image seen . The essence of the science that you are developing - seemingly alone , I am sure on the backs of a few others , is in the story of your focus and the consequences . Just like Vangogh's art - the swirling skies and color contrasts , actually described math that was previously un interpreted , all art is truth seen by the artist , and contained in a stilled dimension , a mini museum - be it a canvas , a theoretical paper , or a dance move , until the moment when it can be discerned by a viewer , or by the collective consciousness . Practicing art is not about owning , rather it is about crystallizing truths so that they can be disseminated and at the same time remain complete . The beauty of a song or an image , is that it is at the same time held still , and at the same time radiated outwards . I believe that the AI description of your work that you put up in the beginning of this article is merely the trumpet announcing the masters work . AI is here to SERVE us , not to be served by us . We should never feel competitive with it . Keep doing your work - you are looking at something that is very important - Biological System Triggering and Harnessing .
For a while , when photography first came out , it was art / not art / then the artists pushed it into art again . The fact that it requires a camera which is a machine , makes it a good medium to analyze this question with , as many people will say " what camera , what lens " and the photographer is like " My mind , my eye " - Ultimately , the speed required to respond to action light and energy requires the speed of heart consciousness , the mind cannot cause a trigger reaction in the moment . - I had an experience once when I captured a moment where a polo pony was running , four legs off the ground , the mallet at that moment swung down , and the weight of the horses body mid air and the swing of the mallet actually split the ball in half . And , it was captured by my finger . So ... it is in the story . Now , on the music field , the computer can sort of fabricate songs , song ish sounding noises , but there is no name , no story , no heart . So I do believe it gets down to heart .
I was on a Zoom chat yesterday where this program was demonstrated. My assessment is that by very quickly scouring the entire Internet for relevant information it mimics left brain precision analysis and creation. I see how it will be used to replace humans in jobs that require regimentation. In many respects it represents the median point in human capacity. Which is efficient and perfect for industrial applications. In our conversation, the question was asked, ‘What is a human?’and my response was “A human is a being who is responsible and accountable.” Can AI be considered a morally responsible being? Can it distinguish between right and wrong, not in the abstract, but it’s own awareness of what means to be a morally responsible industrial application? Your point about creating high hanging fruit is the right question and, as discussed in our group, begs the question about how education in the future must change to meet this reality.