Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Francesco Leone's avatar

Interesting article! It is a bit triggering but I feel it is a push to get us more real in world in which is very challenging to get real.

Just some sparse thoughts that came from reading it:

- maybe there could be limitation on tech after big mental health crises of young generation that grew up with phones like it was with cigarettes.

- regarding consciousness and science, the best right now seems to me michael levin is a biologist, there are cool video of him on youtube. To make it short, he is studying how to communicate cells to regenerate limbs or organs. Studying these simplest forms of cognition (then compared to more complex one as us) seems the best way to understand us.

Maybe (just my speculation) this kind of knowledge could be even used to communicate with our neurons and explore more consciousness, explore our belief about space and time and reality. But not sure if from that you could get some final understanding on consciousness. (If there is a final and conclusive understanding on consciousness)

- I do not know which kind of lifestyle would be ideal for human. The current one is using the mind in total isolation (considering tech and sxience) but my ideal would be to use mind and body in integration. The only way that comes to me is using the mind to imagine more complex movements and using the body to perform them (like Ido Portal movement). I think that "a just feel activity" can be kept as a practice (as I have with bio) but can not be a lifestyle something that humans do for long hours because seems not to take into account the mind desire for understanding, complexity and creation.

Expand full comment
Zippy's avatar

I found most of what you wrote to be either horse shit or speculative nonsense. I did like your third to last paragraph re the suppression and hostility towards the Feminine principle which urgently needs to be re-integrated into Western consciousness.

It is interesting to note that it is only recently that Western philosophers have even begun to talk about consciousness either with a lower case or capital C. But even then they mostly conflate consciousness with the much-hyped Western mind.

Witness even the hostility towards. the idea of pan-psychism

Historically there have always been very strong taboos in Western culture re the understanding and more importantly the Realization of higher forms of Yogic knowledge.

In our time and place there are very strong taboos re becoming "too mystical"

So too with Christian philosophers and so called theologians. More often than not they then conflate consciousness with the much hyped Christian mind. Thomists (or tomb-ists) specialize in this gambit. Mis-inspired by the much over-hyped Aquinas they thus then develop 5 bullshit theories to "prove the existence of god" - the benighted Feser for example.

Another example is the benighted idea of using the Christian mind to put on the "amour of god" or to build an impenetrable fortress against the "temptations of the devil or satan".

One now-time notable exception to all of the usual Christian blather can be found in the work of David Bentley-Hart, although try as he might the Christian tradition is dualistic all-the-way-down.

More later on but in the meantime check out this reference re someone who actually Realized what Consciousness Is http://www.merell-wolff.org He also wrote a remarkable essay on the Feminine Principle titled The Celestial Virgin.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts